33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives of your police is usually to apprehend offenders, look into crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and over all, be certain law and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The legislation enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other Courts, but they have failed to have any corrective effect on it.
How much sway case law holds might range by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of the current case. To take a look at this concept, look at the following case regulation definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the uncovered counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard into the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) of the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession with the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
Sign up for E-mail Notification of new opinions The cases listed beneath have had opinions filed for them within the last fourteen days. The following information is readily available for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as established forth would not apply, since the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has become acquitted of your criminal charges based on evidence and it's nicely-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted during the criminal case, then on this very charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment through the department and held him disqualified for that post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition continues to be established at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case of the District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.
While there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds minimal sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent during the home state, relevant case legislation from another state may very well be thought of with the court.
27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airways Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi get more info Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. twenty/2011, this does not automatically bring about exoneration from departmental charges based on the same factual grounds. Although a writ under Article 199 is out there in specific limited situations, it really is generally not the right remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-look at witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't influence the department of his/her innocence.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is actually a free and democratic region, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents with the boy or Lady don't approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they're able to Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is neither harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
The DCFS social worker in charge on the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated on the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside a way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is including no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to really make it ideal to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-take pleasure in the evidence or the nature of punishment. Within the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified through the decision in the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions tend to be the opinions that are filed within the day that the appellate court issues its decision and will often be not the court's final opinion.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case regulation previously rendered on similar cases.
Criminal cases During the common legislation tradition, courts decide the law applicable to a case by interpreting statutes and implementing precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Contrary to most civil law systems, common regulation systems Keep to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their possess previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all reduced courts should make decisions consistent with the previous decisions of higher courts.